RE: [PATCH 097/117] Staging: hv: storvsc: Add code to handle IDE devices using the storvsc driver
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Date: 2011-07-16 12:57:33
Also in:
lkml
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Date: 2011-07-16 12:57:33
Also in:
lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@infradead.org] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:05 PM To: KY Srinivasan Cc: gregkh@suse.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization@lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH 097/117] Staging: hv: storvsc: Add code to handle IDE devices using the storvsc driver Thanks, this looks much cleaner than the initial variant.quoted
+ if (dev_is_ide) { + storvsc_get_ide_info(device, &target, &path); + host_dev->path = device_info.path_id; + host_dev->target = device_info.target_id; + } else { + host_dev->path = device_info.path_id; + host_dev->target = device_info.target_id; + }Is using the device_info values in both branches intentional? If so there's no need to have these assignments duplicated.
While we set the values in both the branches, the value set is different; The IDE side encodes the bits differently and is appropriately parsed in the function storvsc_get_ide_info(). Regards, K. Y