Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2011-08-03

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] virtio_net: refill buffer right after being used

From: Shirley Ma <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-31 05:16:15
Also in: kvm, netdev

On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 16:58 -0700, Mike Waychison wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Shirley Ma [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
Resubmit it with a typo fix.

Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma <redacted>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 0c7321c..c8201d4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -429,6 +429,22 @@ static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct
virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
quoted
       return err;
 }

+static int fill_one(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+       int err;
+
+       if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
+               err = add_recvbuf_mergeable(vi, gfp);
+       else if (vi->big_packets)
+               err = add_recvbuf_big(vi, gfp);
+       else
+               err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, gfp);
+
+       if (err >= 0)
+               ++vi->num;
+       return err;
+}
+
 /* Returns false if we couldn't fill entirely (OOM). */
 static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
 {
@@ -436,17 +452,10 @@ static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info
*vi, gfp_t gfp)
quoted
       bool oom;

       do {
-               if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
-                       err = add_recvbuf_mergeable(vi, gfp);
-               else if (vi->big_packets)
-                       err = add_recvbuf_big(vi, gfp);
-               else
-                       err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, gfp);
-
+               err = fill_one(vi, gfp);
               oom = err == -ENOMEM;
               if (err < 0)
                       break;
-               ++vi->num;
       } while (err > 0);
       if (unlikely(vi->num > vi->max))
               vi->max = vi->num;
@@ -506,13 +515,13 @@ again:
               receive_buf(vi->dev, buf, len);
               --vi->num;
               received++;
-       }
-
-       if (vi->num < vi->max / 2) {
-               if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_ATOMIC))
+               if (fill_one(vi, GFP_ATOMIC) < 0)
                       schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
       }

+       /* notify buffers are refilled */
+       virtqueue_kick(vi->rvq);
+
How does this reduce latency?   We are doing the same amount of work
in both cases, and in both cases the newly available buffers are not
visible to the device until the virtqueue_kick..
It averages the latency between each receive by filling only one set of
buffers vs. either none buffers or 1/2 ring size buffers fill between
receives.
quoted
       /* Out of packets? */
       if (received < budget) {
               napi_complete(napi);


-- 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help