Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2011-06-09

Re: [PATCH 7/7] [v4] drivers/virt: introduce Freescale hypervisor management driver

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2011-06-09 07:38:22

On Thursday 09 June 2011 01:10:09 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:45:54 -0500 Timur Tabi wrote:
quoted
Add the drivers/virt directory, which houses drivers that support
virtualization environments, and add the Freescale hypervisor management
driver.
It can't go in linux/virt or linux/virt/fsl instead?  why drivers/ ?

or maybe linux/virt should be drivers/virt ?
See discussion for v2 of this patch. I suggested that drivers/firmware and virt/
as options, the counterarguments were that drivers/firmware is for passive
firmware as opposed to firmware that acts as a hypervisor, and that virt/ is
for the host side of hypervisors like kvm, not for guests.

The driver in here most closely resembles the xen dom0 model, where a
priviledged guest controls other guests, but unlike xen there is a single
driver file, so there is no need to have drivers/fsl-hv directory just
for this one file. We do have a number of other hypervisors that fit in the
same category, so they can be added here later.

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help