Re: [PATCHv2 10/14] virtio_net: limit xmit polling
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2011-05-24 11:29:39
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:57:43PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
"Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote on 05/24/2011 02:42:55 PM:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
To do this properly, we should really be using the actual number ofsgquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
elements needed, but we'd have to do most of xmit_skb beforehand sowequoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
know how many. Cheers, Rusty.Maybe I'm confused here. The problem isn't the failing add_buf for the given skb IIUC. What we are trying to do here isstopquoted
quoted
quoted
the queue *before xmit_skb fails*. We can't look at the number of fragments in the current skb - the next one can be much larger. That's why we check capacity after xmit_skb, not before it, right?Maybe Rusty means it is a simpler model to free the amount of space that this xmit needs. We will still fail anyway at some time but it is unlikely, since earlier iteration freed up atleast the space that it was going to use.Not sure I nderstand. We can't know space is freed in the previous iteration as buffers might not have been used by then.Yes, the first few iterations may not have freed up space, but later ones should. The amount of free space should increase from then on, especially since we try to free double of what we consume.
Hmm. This is only an upper limit on the # of entries in the queue. Assume that vq size is 4 and we transmit 4 enties without getting anything in the used ring. The next transmit will fail. So I don't really see why it's unlikely that we reach the packet drop code with your patch.
quoted
quoted
The code could become much simpler: start_xmit() { { num_sgs = get num_sgs for this skb; /* Free enough pending old buffers to enable queueing this one*/quoted
quoted
free_old_xmit_skbs(vi, num_sgs * 2); /* ?? */ if (virtqueue_get_capacity() < num_sgs) { netif_stop_queue(dev); if (virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vi->svq) || free_old_xmit_skbs(vi, num_sgs)) { /* Nothing freed up, or not enough freed up */ kfree_skb(skb); return NETDEV_TX_OK;This packet drop is what we wanted to avoid.Please see below on returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY.quoted
quoted
} netif_start_queue(dev); virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->svq); } /* xmit_skb cannot fail now, also pass 'num_sgs' */ xmit_skb(vi, skb, num_sgs); virtqueue_kick(vi->svq); skb_orphan(skb); nf_reset(skb); return NETDEV_TX_OK; } We could even return TX_BUSY since that makes the dequeue code more efficient. See dev_dequeue_skb() - you can skip a lot of code (and avoid taking locks) to check if the queue is already stopped but that code runs only if you return TX_BUSY in the earlier iteration. BTW, shouldn't the check in start_xmit be: if (likely(!free_old_xmit_skbs(vi, 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS))) { ... } Thanks, - KKI thought we used to do basically this but other devices moved to a model where they stop *before* queueing fails, so we did too.I am not sure of why it was changed, since returning TX_BUSY seems more efficient IMHO. qdisc_restart() handles requeue'd packets much better than a stopped queue, as a significant part of this code is skipped if gso_skb is present
I think this is the argument: http://www.mail-archive.com/virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg06364.html
(qdisc will eventually start dropping packets when tx_queue_len is exceeded anyway). Thanks, - KK
tx_queue_len is a pretty large buffer so maybe no. I think the packet drops from the scheduler queue can also be done intelligently (e.g. with CHOKe) which should work better than dropping a random packet? -- MST