Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2011-03-02

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Staging: hv: Unify hyper-v device abstractions

From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-01 05:46:17
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:05:30PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
Hyper-V drivers have supported two device abstractions.
This patch implements a single device abstraction.
"This patch" or "This patch series"?
This simplifies the code and avoids duplication
of state.
This patch is confusing, you are renaming structures (from hv_ to vm_)
which I didn't think you wanted to do.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <redacted>

---
 drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc.c        |   17 ++++---
 drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc_drv.c    |   14 +++---
 drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c  |    1 +
 drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.h  |    2 +-
 drivers/staging/hv/netvsc.c        |   55 ++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/staging/hv/netvsc.h        |    2 +-
 drivers/staging/hv/netvsc_api.h    |   12 +++---
 drivers/staging/hv/netvsc_drv.c    |   28 +++++-------
 drivers/staging/hv/rndis_filter.c  |   19 ++++----
 drivers/staging/hv/storvsc.c       |   37 ++++++++--------
 drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_api.h   |    4 +-
 drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c   |   21 ++++-----
 drivers/staging/hv/vmbus.h         |   13 +++---
 drivers/staging/hv/vmbus_api.h     |   29 ++----------
 drivers/staging/hv/vmbus_drv.c     |   84 +++++++++++++++---------------------
 drivers/staging/hv/vmbus_private.h |   12 +++---
 16 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc.c b/drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc.c
index 7c8729b..ecface3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc.c
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ static const struct hv_guid g_blk_device_type = {
 	}
 };
 
-static int blk_vsc_on_device_add(struct hv_device *device, void *additional_info)
+static int blk_vsc_on_device_add(struct vm_device *device,
+				void *additional_info)
Huh?  What was this change for?  80 column issues for function
definitions is not a big deal, if any, and should not be burried in a
patch that claims to do something else.

Still totally confused,

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help