Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2010-10-12

Re: [patch 1/2] vhost: potential integer overflows

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2010-10-12 12:32:17
Also in: kernel-janitors, kvm, netdev

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 07:22:57PM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
I did an audit for potential integer overflows of values which get passed
to access_ok() and here are the results.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index dd3d6f7..c2aa12c 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -429,6 +429,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num,
 			struct vring_avail __user *avail,
 			struct vring_used __user *used)
 {
+
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *desc)
+		return 0;
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *avail->ring - sizeof *avail)
+		return 0;
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *used->ring - sizeof *used)
+		return 0;
+
 	return access_ok(VERIFY_READ, desc, num * sizeof *desc) &&
 	       access_ok(VERIFY_READ, avail,
 			 sizeof *avail + num * sizeof *avail->ring) &&
@@ -447,6 +455,9 @@ int vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *dev)
 /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */
 static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, void __user *log_base)
 {
+	if (vq->num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *vq->used->ring - sizeof *vq->used)
+		return 0;
+
 	return vq_memory_access_ok(log_base, vq->dev->memory,
 			    vhost_has_feature(vq->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) &&
 		(!vq->log_used || log_access_ok(log_base, vq->log_addr,
@@ -606,12 +617,17 @@ static long vhost_set_vring(struct vhost_dev *d, int ioctl, void __user *argp)
 			}
 
 			/* Also validate log access for used ring if enabled. */
-			if ((a.flags & (0x1 << VHOST_VRING_F_LOG)) &&
-			    !log_access_ok(vq->log_base, a.log_guest_addr,
+			if (a.flags & (0x1 << VHOST_VRING_F_LOG)) {
+				if (vq->num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *vq->used->ring - sizeof *vq->used) {
+					r = -EINVAL;
+					break;
+				}
+				if (!log_access_ok(vq->log_base, a.log_guest_addr,
 					   sizeof *vq->used +
 					   vq->num * sizeof *vq->used->ring)) {
-				r = -EINVAL;
-				break;
+					r = -EINVAL;
+					break;
+				}
 			}
 		}
 

As far as I can see, maximum value for num is 64K - 1:

                if (!s.num || s.num > 0xffff || (s.num & (s.num - 1))) {
                        r = -EINVAL;
                        break;
                }

How can any of the above two trigger?
It seems easier to check value for sanity at a single place where it's
passed from userspace to kernel.

-- 
MST
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help