Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2010-03-24

Re: [RFC] vhost-blk implementation

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2010-03-23 12:42:51
Also in: qemu-devel

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:34:04PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Write Results:
==============

I see degraded IO performance when doing sequential IO write
tests with vhost-blk compared to virtio-blk.

# time dd of=/dev/vda if=/dev/zero bs=2M oflag=direct

I get ~110MB/sec with virtio-blk, but I get only ~60MB/sec with
vhost-blk. Wondering why ?
Try to look and number of interrupts and/or number of exits.

It could also be that you are overrunning some queue.

I don't see any exit mitigation strategy in your patch:
when there are already lots of requests in a queue, it's usually
a good idea to disable notifications and poll the
queue as requests complete. That could help performance.


-- 
MST
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help