Re: [RFC] vhost-blk implementation
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2010-03-23 12:42:51
Also in:
qemu-devel
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2010-03-23 12:42:51
Also in:
qemu-devel
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:34:04PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Write Results: ============== I see degraded IO performance when doing sequential IO write tests with vhost-blk compared to virtio-blk. # time dd of=/dev/vda if=/dev/zero bs=2M oflag=direct I get ~110MB/sec with virtio-blk, but I get only ~60MB/sec with vhost-blk. Wondering why ?
Try to look and number of interrupts and/or number of exits. It could also be that you are overrunning some queue. I don't see any exit mitigation strategy in your patch: when there are already lots of requests in a queue, it's usually a good idea to disable notifications and poll the queue as requests complete. That could help performance. -- MST