Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-22 09:28:36
Also in:
lkml
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-22 09:28:36
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:23:14PM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
In general, I/O in a virtual guest is subject to performance problems. The I/O can not be completed physically, but must be virtualized. This means trapping and decoding port I/O instructions from the guest OS. Not only is the trap for a #GP heavyweight, both in the processor and the hypervisor (which usually has a complex #GP path), but this forces the hypervisor to decode the individual instruction which has faulted.
Is that really that expensive? Hard to imagine. e.g. you could always have a fast check for inb/outb at the beginning of the #GP handler. And is your initial #GP entry really more expensive than a hypercall?
Worse, even with hardware assist such as VT, the exit reason alone is not sufficient to determine the true nature of the faulting instruction, requiring a complex and costly instruction decode and simulation.
It's unclear to me why that should be that costly. Worst case it's a switch() -Andi