Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting
From: Avi Kivity <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-13 14:19:49
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:quoted
quoted
[copying Ingo and Rusty]@Avi, seems that sourceforge is mangling the cc list?
It's not configured to do so. Can you be more specific?
quoted
quoted
The patches look good. A couple of comments: - perhaps the new fields should be guarded by a #ifdef CONFIG_HYPERVISOR (selected by CONFIG_KVM)? that way the (minor) additional overhead is only incurred if it can possibly be used. I imagine that our canine cousin will want to use this as well.There is also a CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION and a CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING (from s390 and powerpc) Which one to use ?CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING is used for the precise accouting of user,system, steal and irq time on these platforms and is not what you want for the on/off decision.
Ah, ok.
quoted
I'm wondering if we can have a more accurate accounting: - For the moment we add all system time since the previous entering to the VCPU to the guest time (and I guess there is some real system time in it ???) - Perhaps we can sum nanoseconds spent in the VCPU and add it to cpustat when these ns are greater than 1 ms ? (I'm trying to make something in thisway) If you look at the patch I have posted some minutes ago, I use a method similar to irq_enter and irq_exit to separate real system time from guest time.
Yes. This is orthogonal to the current accounting patch and should make a nice extension. It's probably useful with dynamic tick where timer interrupts can be rare. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function