Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option
From: Jeff Dike <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-20 14:10:11
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2007-07-23 · Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option · Rusty Russell <hidden>
- 2007-07-21 · Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option · Jan Engelhardt <hidden>
- 2007-07-20 · Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option · Rusty Russell <hidden>
- 2007-07-20 · Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option · Avi Kivity <hidden>
- 2007-07-20 · Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option · Alexey Eremenko <hidden>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:10:54PM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
I'm rather indifferent on the matter, but I think a virtualization menu under UML would be very confusing.
Yeah, that would be interesting. Trying to get one menu, with switches that the arch can turn on and off, seems to make sense if you can get away without too many switches. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com