Re: lguest re-review
From: Rusty Russell <hidden>
Date: 2007-05-10 01:30:42
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 17:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:24:08 +1000 Rusty Russell [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations about the author's personal appearance, etc.Thanks Andrew, This means I can finally ack this patch (thanks Eric): From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[PATCH] paravirt: Add startup infrastructure for paravirtualization" This reverts commit c9ccf30d77f04064fe5436027ab9d2230c7cdd94.I don't get it. Does lguest no longer need this code, or will it be reintroduced with an lguest merge, or something else?
Lguest no longer needs it (the magic signature patch you took). HPA and Eric are brewing a new, shinier way for booting not-a-normal-pc which will address lguest as well as others. But it seems they first need to go through the "who knows most about ancient PCs" slapfight. Thanks! Rusty.