Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 1/3] KVM paravirt_ops infrastructure
From: Anthony Liguori <hidden>
Date: 2007-05-31 17:28:11
Also in:
kvm
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:quoted
On Thursday 31 May 2007 12:11:16 Ingo Molnar wrote:quoted
* Andi Kleen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
+ if (wrmsr_safe(MSR_KVM_API_MAGIC, __pa(para_state), 0)) { + printk(KERN_INFO "KVM guest: WRMSR probe failed.\n"); + return -ENOENT; + }How about printk(KERN_INFO "I am not a KVM guest\n");?Actually paravirt probes that fail should be silent; similar like drivers that don't find their hardware should do the same. Otherwise if there are later distro kernels with various of those compiled in the boot log would become quite noisyyeah. I suspect printing that it's executing in native mode is OK.But only a single printk for that pleaseWhich already exists in paravirt.c: static void __init default_banner(void) { printk(KERN_INFO "Booting paravirtualized kernel on %s\n", paravirt_ops.name); } ... static int __init print_banner(void) { paravirt_ops.banner(); return 0; } core_initcall(print_banner); Hmm, this will predate your kvm initcall tho, and making that a pure_initcall is pretty gross...
My current patch uses core_initcall() and presumably works by magic of linking order. Any other suggestions over core_initcall()? Regards, Anthony Liguori
Cheers, Rusty. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel