Re: [RFC, PATCH] Fixup COMPAT_VDSO to work with CONFIG_PARAVIRT
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-16 16:31:47
Also in:
lkml
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-16 16:31:47
Also in:
lkml
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The practical question here is if we already have all of the relocation logic for the VDSO why do we need to add more?The kernel doesn't normally ever relocate the vdso; [...]
that's what is the case right now, but much of the intention behind the vma based vDSO is to enable per-process randomized vdso locations, and various distributions do that. So the 'modern' vDSO concept is very much relocatable. Ingo