Thread (87 messages) 87 messages, 12 authors, 2007-02-22

Re: [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface

From: Zachary Amsden <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-21 18:55:40
Also in: lkml, xen-devel

Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

  
quoted
That was always its intention. It's not a direct interface to a hypervisor,
but an somewhat abstracted interface to a "hypervisor driver" 
    
I thought that hypervisor driver was some binary blob that can be directly
accessed via paravirt_ops?
  
There are no more binary blobs being used by paravirt-ops hypervisors.  
I prefer the term "open hypercode layer".

quoted
But you're right that there are currently still quite a lot of hooks
being added. I plan to be much more strict on that in the future.
    
And it seems that the hooks are not generic but bound to a particular 
hypervisor. Should the Xen specific stuff not be in the binary blob?
  
Xen doesn't use a hypercode layer, and there is no way to do what they 
need to do without hooks in the kernel.

Zach
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help