Re: [patch 16/21] Xen-paravirt: Add code into head.S to handle being booted by Xen
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-15 01:52:12
Also in:
lkml, xen-devel
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2007-02-15 · Re: [patch 16/21] Xen-paravirt: Add code into head.S to handle being booted by Xen · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
- 2007-02-15 · Re: [patch 16/21] Xen-paravirt: Add code into head.S to handle being booted by Xen · Jeremy Fitzhardinge <hidden>
- 2007-02-15 · Re: [patch 16/21] Xen-paravirt: Add code into head.S to handle being booted by Xen · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
- 2007-02-15 · Re: [patch 16/21] Xen-paravirt: Add code into head.S to handle being booted by Xen · Jeremy Fitzhardinge <hidden>
- 2007-02-14 · Re: [patch 16/21] Xen-paravirt: Add code into head.S to handle being booted by Xen · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Reasonable and it's probably worth letting the binutils developer know. I do agree that it is weird. It might be that something in binutils doesn't like us dropping some of the notes.
What do you mean by "dropping some of the notes"? I think the only
notes (at least in this case) are the Xen ones, and they're all included.
J