On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 01:40 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

What was the point of this again?  Was it that these two operations are
used so commonly together that its worth having a special type for them,
or is there some correctness issue here?

It seems to me that having it adds a fair amount of fiddley complexity,
and it doesn't gain very much because patching will make each operation
individually fairly efficient.

Yes, the combo was *so* common we went for one patch site rather than
two.

Rusty.