Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2006-12-13

Re: Why disable vdso by default with CONFIG_PARAVIRT?

From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2006-12-12 03:02:19

On Tuesday 12 December 2006 02:22, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
What problem do they cause together?  There's certainly no problem with
Xen+vdso
This was the change which finally got my test system (with an older
SUSE 9.0 based user land to boot).  With paravirt older glibc's ld.so 
otherwise throws assertation failures because it somehow can't deal with 
the new placement. This only happens with paravirt enabled.

Binary compatibility is important.
(in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
AFAIK libc selection comes from the aux vector, not the vdso.

-Andi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help