Re: [patch 3/9] Guest page hinting: volatile page cache.
From: Martin Schwidefsky <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-15 08:36:44
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 02:23 -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
Martin Schwidefsky wrotequoted
The discard fault happens on access to a volatile that has been discarded. An important property of the s390 architecture comes into play here: there are two page tables, a guest page table and a host page table. What the guest perceives as its "physical" memory is in virtual storage for the host. An address resolution has to walk two pages tables, if a pte is invalid in either table you get a fault. A guest fault if the invalid pte is in the guest table and a host fault if it isYes, I'm familiar with that trick. Wasn't sure if you had it in hardware or not.
The mainframes have that trick in hardware for about 30 years ..
quoted
in the host table. That gives s390 a simple method to implement discarded pages: the hypervisor just unmaps the page from the host table and changes the state of the guest page. I can see that you will have a much harder time to implement this on i386.Nah, I think we'll do just fine.
I wonder which trick you use, since there is only one page table one i386 I can only imagine that you are tracking all page tables of the guest.
Thanks for the info - based on this, I think we can probably use the volatile page / swap cache changes as well for VMware, also pretty much unchanged. Sorry to take so long to look at these patches, BTW - I was on holiday for two weeks.
I've been sitting on these patches for months now and you are worrying about two weeks.. -- blue skies, Martin. Martin Schwidefsky Linux for zSeries Development & Services IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.