Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 5 authors, 2006-09-21

Re: Per-cpu patches on top of PDA stuff...

From: Rusty Russell <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-21 08:54:14

On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 14:10 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 19:49 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted
Because it makes it easier to write other code? We don't really
want any unnecessary limiting assumptions in arch/i386 just because
of some obscure machine with one user.
Really?  I don't see it that way.  I did a lot of work back in 2000/2001
to break x86 of its remapped CPU assumptions ... it's been operating
nicely for 6 years, I don't see a reason to break it now.
I agree with James, it's just that I can't test it.  I'll send you my
patch set when I'm done, please test...

Thanks!
Rusty.
-- 
Help! Save Australia from the worst of the DMCA: http://linux.org.au/law
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help