Re: Per-cpu patches on top of PDA stuff...
From: Rusty Russell <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-21 08:54:14
From: Rusty Russell <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-21 08:54:14
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 14:10 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 19:49 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:quoted
Because it makes it easier to write other code? We don't really want any unnecessary limiting assumptions in arch/i386 just because of some obscure machine with one user.Really? I don't see it that way. I did a lot of work back in 2000/2001 to break x86 of its remapped CPU assumptions ... it's been operating nicely for 6 years, I don't see a reason to break it now.
I agree with James, it's just that I can't test it. I'll send you my patch set when I'm done, please test... Thanks! Rusty. -- Help! Save Australia from the worst of the DMCA: http://linux.org.au/law