Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
From: Alistair Delva <redacted>
commit 94c4b4fd25e6c3763941bdec3ad54f2204afa992 upstream.
[SNIP]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/block/ioprio.c
+++ b/block/ioprio.c
@@ -69,7 +69,14 @@ int ioprio_check_cap(int ioprio)
switch (class) {
case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT:
- if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ /*
+ * Originally this only checked for CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
+ * which was implicitly allowed for pid 0 by security
+ * modules such as SELinux. Make sure we check
+ * CAP_SYS_ADMIN first to avoid a denial/avc for
+ * possibly missing CAP_SYS_NICE permission.
+ */
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
return -EPERM;
fallthrough;
/* rt has prio field too */
What exactly is above patch trying to fix?
It does not change control flow at all, and added comment is misleading.
--
Jari Ruusu 4096R/8132F189 12D6 4C3A DCDA 0AA4 27BD ACDF F073 3C80 8132 F189