Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: s390: backport for stable of "KVM: s390: index | stable | Ratatoskr

[PATCH 0/1] KVM: s390: backport for stable of "KVM: s390: index · Christian Borntraeger <hidden> · 2021-09-20
[PATCH 1/1] KVM: s390: index kvm->arch.idle_mask by vcpu_idx · Christian Borntraeger <hidden> · 2021-09-20
Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: s390: index kvm->arch.idle_mask by vcpu_idx · Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-09-21
Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: s390: backport for stable of "KVM: s390: index · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2021-09-20
Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: s390: backport for stable of "KVM: s390: index · Christian Borntraeger <hidden> · 2021-09-20
Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: s390: backport for stable of "KVM: s390: index · Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> · 2021-09-20
Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: s390: backport for stable of "KVM: s390: index · Christian Borntraeger <hidden> · 2021-09-21
Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: s390: backport for stable of "KVM: s390: index · Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> · 2021-09-21

Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: s390: backport for stable of "KVM: s390: index

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-09-21 13:04:38
Also in: kvm, linux-s390

On 21/09/21 10:46, Christian Borntraeger wrote:

quoted

quoted

Sure, I suppose you're going to send a separate backport that I can
ack.

It does seem to apply when cherry-picked, but I can send it as a
patch if you and Greg prefer it that way.

Yes, please do!  Thanks,

Paolo