From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
[ Upstream commit 58e636039b512697554b579c2bb23774061877f5 ]
In cpu_bringup() there is a call of preempt_disable() without a paired
preempt_enable(). This is not needed as interrupts are off initially.
Additionally this will result in early boot messages like:
BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/1/0/0x00000002
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825113158.11716-1-jgross@suse.com (local)
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
index c2ac319f11a4..96afadf9878e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ static void cpu_bringup(void)
cr4_init();
cpu_init();
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
- preempt_disable();
/* PVH runs in ring 0 and allows us to do native syscalls. Yay! */
if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_supervisor_mode_kernel)) {--
2.30.2