Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 4 authors, 2021-08-27

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] libata: libata: add ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM for Samsung 860 and 870 SSDs

From: Damien Le Moal <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 06:04:22
Also in: linux-ide, lkml

On 2021/08/27 14:34, Kate Hsuan wrote:
A flag ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ_ON_ASMEDIA_AMD_MARVELL is added to disable NCQ
on AMD/MAREL/ASMEDIA chipsets.

Samsung 860/870 SSD are disabled to use NCQ trim functions but it will
lead to performace drop. From the bugzilla, we could realize the issues
only appears on those chipset mentioned above. So this flag could be
used to only disable NCQ on specific chipsets.

Fixes: ca6bfcb2f6d9 ("libata: Enable queued TRIM for Samsung SSD 860")
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203475
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Since this is a v2, you should not keep the review tag here.
Signed-off-by: Kate Hsuan <hpa@redhat.com>
---
This is a v2 patch, so please add the changelog from v1 here.

But I think that v1 introduced ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM. Yet, here you introduce
a completely different flag on top of the patch that introduced
ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM. So this patch is not version 2 of the previous one. It
is a completely different patch. Unless I missed v1 on the list...

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/libata.h    |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index cc459ce90018..50f635669dd4 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -2119,6 +2119,8 @@ static inline u8 ata_dev_knobble(struct ata_device *dev)
 static void ata_dev_config_ncq_send_recv(struct ata_device *dev)
 {
 	struct ata_port *ap = dev->link->ap;
+	struct device *parent = NULL;
+	struct pci_dev *pcidev = NULL;
 	unsigned int err_mask;
 
 	if (!ata_log_supported(dev, ATA_LOG_NCQ_SEND_RECV)) {
@@ -2138,9 +2140,32 @@ static void ata_dev_config_ncq_send_recv(struct ata_device *dev)
 		memcpy(cmds, ap->sector_buf, ATA_LOG_NCQ_SEND_RECV_SIZE);
 
 		if (dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM) {
-			ata_dev_dbg(dev, "disabling queued TRIM support\n");
-			cmds[ATA_LOG_NCQ_SEND_RECV_DSM_OFFSET] &=
-				~ATA_LOG_NCQ_SEND_RECV_DSM_TRIM;
+			if (dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ_ON_ASMEDIA_AMD_MARVELL)
+			{
Please follow the kernel coding style: do not break line before "{". This
comment applies to all your modifications below too.
+				// get parent device for the controller vendor ID
+				for(parent = dev->tdev.parent; parent != NULL; parent = parent->parent)
+				{
+					if(dev_is_pci(parent))
+					{
+						pcidev = to_pci_dev(parent);
+						if (pcidev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL ||
+							pcidev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD 	||
+							pcidev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ASMEDIA )
Please align the conditions.
+						{
+							ata_dev_dbg(dev, "Disable NCQ -> vendor ID %x product ID %x\n", 
+												pcidev->vendor, pcidev->device);
Weird alignment here too. Move the arguments aligned with "dev" at the beginning
of the line.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+							cmds[ATA_LOG_NCQ_SEND_RECV_DSM_OFFSET] &=
+								~ATA_LOG_NCQ_SEND_RECV_DSM_TRIM;
+						}
+						break;
+					}
+				}
+			}else
+			{
+				ata_dev_dbg(dev, "disabling queued TRIM support\n");
+				cmds[ATA_LOG_NCQ_SEND_RECV_DSM_OFFSET] &=
+					~ATA_LOG_NCQ_SEND_RECV_DSM_TRIM;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -3951,9 +3976,11 @@ static const struct ata_blacklist_entry ata_device_blacklist [] = {
 	{ "Samsung SSD 850*",		NULL,	ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
 						ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM, },
 	{ "Samsung SSD 860*",           NULL,   ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
-						ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM, },
+						ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM |
+						ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ_ON_ASMEDIA_AMD_MARVELL, },
You named your flag ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ_ON_ASMEDIA_AMD_MARVELL but you are
applying it to a Samsung device. This is rather confusing. I do not think you
need to have the vendor in the flag name, e.g. ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ. Whatever
device in ata_device_blacklist has the flag will have NCQ disabled.
 	{ "Samsung SSD 870*",           NULL,   ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
-						ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM, },
+						ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM |
+						ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ_ON_ASMEDIA_AMD_MARVELL, },
If you disable NCQ entirely for this device, then what is the point of keeping
ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM ? TRIM commands will not be NCQ anymore, similarly to
all other commands.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 	{ "FCCT*M500*",			NULL,	ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
 						ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM, },
 
diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index 3fcd24236793..ec17f1f3fbf6 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -422,6 +422,9 @@ enum {
 	ATA_HORKAGE_NOTRIM	= (1 << 24),	/* don't use TRIM */
 	ATA_HORKAGE_MAX_SEC_1024 = (1 << 25),	/* Limit max sects to 1024 */
 	ATA_HORKAGE_MAX_TRIM_128M = (1 << 26),	/* Limit max trim size to 128M */
+	ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ_ON_ASMEDIA_AMD_MARVELL = (1 << 27), /*Disable NCQ only on 
+							ASMeida, AMD, and Marvell 
+							Chipset*/
See above. You do not need to have the vendor name in the flag name.
 
 	 /* DMA mask for user DMA control: User visible values; DO NOT
 	    renumber */

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help