Re: [PATCH 5.10 125/135] drm/i915: avoid uninitialised var in eb_parse()
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-11 12:28:12
Also in:
lkml
On Wed 2021-08-11 09:46:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 09:28:43AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:quoted
Hi!quoted
From: Jonathan Gray <redacted> The backport of c9d9fdbc108af8915d3f497bbdf3898bf8f321b8 to 5.10 in 6976f3cf34a1a8b791c048bbaa411ebfe48666b1 removed more than it should have leading to 'batch' being used uninitialised. The 5.13 backport and the mainline commit did not remove the portion this patch adds back.This patch has no upstream equivalent, right? Which is okay -- it explains it in plain english, but it shows that scripts should not simply search for anything that looks like SHA and treat it as upsteam commit it.Sounds like you have a broken script if you do it that way.
That is what you told me to do! https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YQEvUay+1Rzp04SO@kroah.com/ (local) I would happily adapt my script, but there's no good/documented/working way to determine upstream commit given -stable commit. If we could agree on Commit: (SHA) in the beggining of body, that would be great. Upstream: (SHA) in sign-off area would be even better. Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 195 bytes