From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
commit f96d44743a44e3332f75d23d2075bb8270900e1d upstream.
Error injection testing uncovered a case where we ended up with invalid
link counts on an inode. This happened because we failed to notice an
error when updating the inode while replaying the tree log, and
committed the transaction with an invalid file system.
Fix this by checking the return value of btrfs_update_inode. This
resolved the link count errors I was seeing, and we already properly
handle passing up the error values in these paths.
CC: <redacted> # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -1574,7 +1574,9 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct
if (ret)
goto out;
- btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, BTRFS_I(inode));
+ ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, BTRFS_I(inode));
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
}
ref_ptr = (unsigned long)(ref_ptr + ref_struct_size) + namelen;
@@ -1749,7 +1751,9 @@ static noinline int fixup_inode_link_cou
if (nlink != inode->i_nlink) {
set_nlink(inode, nlink);
- btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, BTRFS_I(inode));
+ ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, BTRFS_I(inode));
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
}
BTRFS_I(inode)->index_cnt = (u64)-1;