Re: [PATCH 5.10 1/2] iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_gen2_enqueue_hcmd()
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-05-02 11:04:28
Also in:
lkml
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-05-02 11:04:28
Also in:
lkml
On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 10:12:42AM +0300, Jari Ruusu wrote:
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:quoted
From: Jiri Kosina <redacted> commit e7020bb068d8be50a92f48e36b236a1a1ef9282e upstream. Analogically to what we did in 2800aadc18a6 ("iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd()"), we must apply the same fix to iwl_pcie_gen2_enqueue_hcmd(), as it's being called from exactly the same contexts.Greg, This patch and above mentioned earlier patch "iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd()", upstream commit 2800aadc18a64c96b051bcb7da8a7df7d505db3f, both need to be backported to older kernels too. I see that there are trivial context rejects if/when you attempt to apply those patches to older kernels. Those trivial context rejects should not prevent backporting them. Maybe run both patches through sed? sed -e s/iwl_txq_space/iwl_queue_space/ -e s/iwl_txq_get_/iwl_pcie_get_/ My ability test in-tree iwlwifi is limited. I compile out-of-tree iwlwifi source, and testing that is limited to pinging mobile-wifi router that does not have SIM-card.
If you could provide backported patches to those kernels you think this is needed to, I can take them directly. Otherwise running sed isn't always the easiest thing to do on my end :) thanks greg k-h