Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 4 authors, 2021-04-26

Re: [PATCH mvebu + mvebu/dt64 4/4] arm64: dts: marvell: armada-37xx: move firmware node to generic dtsi file

From: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-03-12 16:33:00
Also in: linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:18:57 +0100
Pali Rohár [off-list ref] wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2021 16:53:32 Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
quoted
So theoretically the turris-mox-rwtm driver can be renamed into
something else and we can add a different compatible in order not to
sound so turris-mox specific.  
That would be a good idea. And if possible, try to push the hardware
random number code upstream in the firmware repos, so everybody gets
it by default, not just those using your build. Who is responsible for
upstream? Marvell?  
Hello Andrew! The issue is that upstream Marvell repository contains
only 'fuse.bin' application which is suitable only for fuse programming.
I think it is not correct if this Marvell fuse application start
providing other functionality not relevant to fuse programming.
Why not? We can rename it to fuse+hwrng and implement hwrng there.
Maybe Konstantin will agree with such a change :)
And Marvell does not provide any other application (publicly). So it would
be needed to send it as another application, not part of 'fuse.bin'. And
then it complicates build system and compile options, which is already
too complicated (you need to set tons of TF-A options and prepare two
sets of cross compile toolchains).

But because application / firmware for MOX / Armada 3720 is actively
developed on different place, I do not think that it make sense to send
every change to two different locations (and wait for Marvell until
review every change and include it into their repository). Such thing
just increase maintenance cost at both sides.
This is a little bit  better argument than the previous one. But I
think Andrew may be right in that for end-users it just complicates
things if they have more options. Better to give them one option.
For me it looks like a better solution to provide 'wtmi_app.bin'
application with HW number generator from separate repository, where it
is currently developed and where it is available for a longer time.

We are planning to send documentation update to Trusted-Firmware project
to specify how to build Armada 3720 firmware image with our application.
So people who are building Armada 3720 firmware would be able to switch
from Marvell's 'fuse.bin' application to our 'wtmi_app.bin'.
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help