[PATCH 5.10 443/663] pwm: iqs620a: Fix overflow and optimize calculations
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-03-02 01:40:23
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
pwm subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Uwe Kleine-König, Linus Torvalds
From: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
[ Upstream commit 72d6b2459dbd539c1369149e501fdc3dc8ddef16 ]
If state->duty_cycle is 0x100000000000000, the previous calculation of
duty_scale overflows and yields a duty cycle ratio of 0% instead of
100%. Fix this by clamping the requested duty cycle to the maximal
possible duty cycle first. This way it is possible to use a native
integer division instead of a (depending on the architecture) more
expensive 64bit division.
With this change in place duty_scale cannot be bigger than 256 which
allows to simplify the calculation of duty_val.
Fixes: 6f0841a8197b ("pwm: Add support for Azoteq IQS620A PWM generator")
Tested-by: Jeff LaBundy <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-iqs620a.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-iqs620a.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-iqs620a.c
index 7d33e36464360..3e967a12458c6 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-iqs620a.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-iqs620a.c@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static int iqs620_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, { struct iqs620_pwm_private *iqs620_pwm; struct iqs62x_core *iqs62x; - u64 duty_scale; + unsigned int duty_cycle; + unsigned int duty_scale; int ret; if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
@@ -70,7 +71,8 @@ static int iqs620_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, * For lower duty cycles (e.g. 0), the PWM output is simply disabled to * allow an external pull-down resistor to hold the GPIO3/LTX pin low. */ - duty_scale = div_u64(state->duty_cycle * 256, IQS620_PWM_PERIOD_NS); + duty_cycle = min_t(u64, state->duty_cycle, IQS620_PWM_PERIOD_NS); + duty_scale = duty_cycle * 256 / IQS620_PWM_PERIOD_NS; mutex_lock(&iqs620_pwm->lock);
@@ -82,7 +84,7 @@ static int iqs620_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, } if (duty_scale) { - u8 duty_val = min_t(u64, duty_scale - 1, 0xff); + u8 duty_val = duty_scale - 1; ret = regmap_write(iqs62x->regmap, IQS620_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE, duty_val);
--
2.27.0