[PATCH 4.14 154/176] mm: hugetlb: fix a race between freeing and dissolving the page
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-03-01 19:30:55
Also in:
lkml
From: Muchun Song <redacted>
commit 7ffddd499ba6122b1a07828f023d1d67629aa017 upstream
There is a race condition between __free_huge_page()
and dissolve_free_huge_page().
CPU0: CPU1:
// page_count(page) == 1
put_page(page)
__free_huge_page(page)
dissolve_free_huge_page(page)
spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock)
// PageHuge(page) && !page_count(page)
update_and_free_page(page)
// page is freed to the buddy
spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock)
spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock)
clear_page_huge_active(page)
enqueue_huge_page(page)
// It is wrong, the page is already freed
spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock)
The race window is between put_page() and dissolve_free_huge_page().
We should make sure that the page is already on the free list when it is
dissolved.
As a result __free_huge_page would corrupt page(s) already in the buddy
allocator.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Fixes: c8721bbbdd36 ("mm: memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle hugepage")
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <redacted>
Cc: Yang Shi <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
[sudip: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c@@ -69,6 +69,21 @@ DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hugetlb_lock); static int num_fault_mutexes; struct mutex *hugetlb_fault_mutex_table ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; +static inline bool PageHugeFreed(struct page *head) +{ + return page_private(head + 4) == -1UL; +} + +static inline void SetPageHugeFreed(struct page *head) +{ + set_page_private(head + 4, -1UL); +} + +static inline void ClearPageHugeFreed(struct page *head) +{ + set_page_private(head + 4, 0); +} + /* Forward declaration */ static int hugetlb_acct_memory(struct hstate *h, long delta);
@@ -866,6 +881,7 @@ static void enqueue_huge_page(struct hst list_move(&page->lru, &h->hugepage_freelists[nid]); h->free_huge_pages++; h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]++; + SetPageHugeFreed(page); } static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_node_exact(struct hstate *h, int nid)
@@ -883,6 +899,7 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_no return NULL; list_move(&page->lru, &h->hugepage_activelist); set_page_refcounted(page); + ClearPageHugeFreed(page); h->free_huge_pages--; h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--; return page;
@@ -1315,6 +1332,7 @@ static void prep_new_huge_page(struct hs set_hugetlb_cgroup(page, NULL); h->nr_huge_pages++; h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++; + ClearPageHugeFreed(page); spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock); put_page(page); /* free it into the hugepage allocator */ }
@@ -1478,6 +1496,7 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page { int rc = 0; +retry: spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock); if (PageHuge(page) && !page_count(page)) { struct page *head = compound_head(page);
@@ -1487,6 +1506,26 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page rc = -EBUSY; goto out; } + + /* + * We should make sure that the page is already on the free list + * when it is dissolved. + */ + if (unlikely(!PageHugeFreed(head))) { + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock); + cond_resched(); + + /* + * Theoretically, we should return -EBUSY when we + * encounter this race. In fact, we have a chance + * to successfully dissolve the page if we do a + * retry. Because the race window is quite small. + * If we seize this opportunity, it is an optimization + * for increasing the success rate of dissolving page. + */ + goto retry; + } + /* * Move PageHWPoison flag from head page to the raw error page, * which makes any subpages rather than the error page reusable.