Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] tpm: in tpm2_del_space check if ops pointer is still valid
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-05 02:19:59
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 04:34:11PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 00:50 +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:quoted
From: Lino Sanfilippo <redacted> In tpm2_del_space() chip->ops is used for flushing the sessions. However this function may be called after tpm_chip_unregister() which sets the chip->ops pointer to NULL. Avoid a possible NULL pointer dereference by checking if chip->ops is still valid before accessing it. Fixes: a3fbfae82b4c ("tpm: take TPM chip power gating out of tpm_transmit()") Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <redacted> --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c index 784b8b3..9a29a40 100644--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c@@ -58,12 +58,17 @@ int tpm2_init_space(struct tpm_space *space,unsigned int buf_size) void tpm2_del_space(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space) { - mutex_lock(&chip->tpm_mutex); - if (!tpm_chip_start(chip)) { - tpm2_flush_sessions(chip, space); - tpm_chip_stop(chip); + down_read(&chip->ops_sem); + if (chip->ops) { + mutex_lock(&chip->tpm_mutex); + if (!tpm_chip_start(chip)) { + tpm2_flush_sessions(chip, space); + tpm_chip_stop(chip); + } + mutex_unlock(&chip->tpm_mutex); } - mutex_unlock(&chip->tpm_mutex); + up_read(&chip->ops_sem); + kfree(space->context_buf); kfree(space->session_buf); }Actually, this still isn't right. As I said to the last person who reported this, we should be doing a get/put on the ops, not rolling our own here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/e7566e1e48f5be9dca034b4bfb67683b5d3cb88f.camel@HansenPartnership.com/ (local) The reporter went silent before we could get this tested, but could you try, please, because your patch is still hand rolling the ops get/put, just slightly better than it had been done previously. James
Thanks for pointing this out. I'd strongly support Jason's proposal: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20201215175624.GG5487@ziepe.ca/ (local) It's the best long-term way to fix this. Honestly, I have to admit that this thread leaked from me. It happened exactly at the time when I was on vacation. Something must have gone wrong when I pulled emails after that. /Jarkko