Hi Boris,


On 08/29/2018 08:59 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:

...

quoted

  static void __init __sme_map_range_pmd(struct sme_populate_pgd_data *ppd)

@@ -235,6 +235,11 @@ static void __init sme_map_range_encrypted(struct sme_populate_pgd_data *ppd)
  	__sme_map_range(ppd, PMD_FLAGS_ENC, PTE_FLAGS_ENC);
  }
  
+static void __init sme_map_range_encrypted_wp(struct sme_populate_pgd_data *ppd)
+{
+	__sme_map_range(ppd, PMD_FLAGS_ENC_WP, PTE_FLAGS_ENC_WP);
+}
+
  static void __init sme_map_range_decrypted(struct sme_populate_pgd_data *ppd)
  {
  	__sme_map_range(ppd, PMD_FLAGS_DEC, PTE_FLAGS_DEC);

These changes with the _WP flags and helper addition belong in a pre-patch.

Please note that the _WP flags and helper functions are used by this
patch only. Introducing a helper in a separate patch will cause a build
warning. I am leaning to keep the helper in this patch but if you think
it should be done in separate patch then let me know.


-Brijesh