[PATCH 4.4.y 048/101] selftest/seccomp: Fix the flag name SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC
STALE2980d
REVIEWED: 4 (0M)
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-14 09:51:35
Subsystem:
kernel selftest framework, secure computing, the rest · Maintainers:
Shuah Khan, Shuah Khan, Kees Cook, Linus Torvalds
4 review trailers.
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2018-07-13 · [PATCH 4.4.y 048/101] selftest/seccomp: Fix the flag name SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC · Srivatsa S. Bhat <hidden>
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> commit 6c045d07bb305c527140bdec4cf8ab50f7c980d8 upstream Rename SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC to SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC to match the UAPI. Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Kees Cook <redacted> Cc: Shuah Khan <redacted> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> Acked-by: Kees Cook <redacted> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <redacted> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <redacted> Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley (VMware) <redacted> Reviewed-by: Alexey Makhalov <redacted> Reviewed-by: Bo Gan <redacted> --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 882fe83..d446346 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c@@ -1476,8 +1476,8 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, syscall_dropped) #define SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER 1 #endif -#ifndef SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC -#define SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC 1 +#ifndef SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC 1 #endif #ifndef seccomp
@@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ TEST(TSYNC_first) TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!"); } - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &prog); ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) { TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!");
@@ -1810,7 +1810,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_ancestor) self->sibling_count++; } - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) { TH_LOG("Could install filter on all threads!");
@@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_no_filter) TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!"); } - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) { TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!");
@@ -1919,7 +1919,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_one_divergence) self->sibling_count++; } - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_EQ(self->sibling[0].system_tid, ret) { TH_LOG("Did not fail on diverged sibling.");
@@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter) TH_LOG("Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER!"); } - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_EQ(ret, self->sibling[0].system_tid) { TH_LOG("Did not fail on diverged sibling.");
@@ -2000,7 +2000,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter) /* Switch to the remaining sibling */ sib = !sib; - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) { TH_LOG("Expected the remaining sibling to sync");
@@ -2023,7 +2023,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter) while (!kill(self->sibling[sib].system_tid, 0)) sleep(0.1); - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_EQ(0, ret); /* just us chickens */ }