[PATCH 4.4 077/107] proc: Use underscores for SSBD in status

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <redacted>

commit e96f46ee8587607a828f783daa6eb5b44d25004d upstream

The style for the 'status' file is CamelCase or this. _.

Fixes: fae1fa0fc ("proc: Provide details on speculation flaw mitigations")
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley (VMware) <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Makhalov <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Bo Gan <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---

 fs/proc/array.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c

@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static inline void task_seccomp(struct s
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
 	seq_printf(m, "Seccomp:\t%d\n", p->seccomp.mode);
 #endif
-	seq_printf(m, "\nSpeculation Store Bypass:\t");
+	seq_printf(m, "\nSpeculation_Store_Bypass:\t");
 	switch (arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(p, PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS)) {
 	case -EINVAL:
 		seq_printf(m, "unknown");