Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-11-25

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/67] 4.8.11-stable review

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2016-11-25 09:47:58
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:20:40PM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
stable-rc boot: 207 boots: 8 failed, 196 passed with 3 offline (v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7)

Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7/
Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7/

Tree: stable-rc
Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
Git Describe: v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7
Git Commit: 5b1cb43a9ac7f608fdfc590c139aa66ead8d19ed
Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Tested: 57 unique boards, 18 SoC families, 30 builds out of 207

Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7&fail

arm:

    multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
        exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab

    multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
        at91-sama5d4_xplained: 1 failed lab

    exynos_defconfig:
        exynos5250-arndale: 1 failed lab

x86:

    defconfig+CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST=y:
        x86-kvm: 1 failed lab

    defconfig+CONFIG_KASAN=y:
        x86-kvm: 1 failed lab

    defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y:
        x86-kvm: 1 failed lab

    defconfig+kvm_guest:
        x86-kvm: 1 failed lab

    x86_64_defconfig:
        x86-kvm: 1 failed lab
That's not good, is this a code problem, or a "lab" problem?

The logs look like nothing is working for these, so is this a -rc
problem?

thanks,

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help