Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/67] 4.8.11-stable review
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2016-11-25 09:47:58
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:20:40PM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
stable-rc boot: 207 boots: 8 failed, 196 passed with 3 offline (v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7) Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7/ Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7/ Tree: stable-rc Branch: local/linux-4.8.y Git Describe: v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7 Git Commit: 5b1cb43a9ac7f608fdfc590c139aa66ead8d19ed Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Tested: 57 unique boards, 18 SoC families, 30 builds out of 207 Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7&fail arm: multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n: exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y: at91-sama5d4_xplained: 1 failed lab exynos_defconfig: exynos5250-arndale: 1 failed lab x86: defconfig+CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST=y: x86-kvm: 1 failed lab defconfig+CONFIG_KASAN=y: x86-kvm: 1 failed lab defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y: x86-kvm: 1 failed lab defconfig+kvm_guest: x86-kvm: 1 failed lab x86_64_defconfig: x86-kvm: 1 failed lab
That's not good, is this a code problem, or a "lab" problem? The logs look like nothing is working for these, so is this a -rc problem? thanks, greg k-h