Re: [PATCH for-4.5] vfio: fix ioctl error handling
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-02-28 14:10:39
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 07:23:22AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:34:43 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Calling return copy_to_user(...) in an ioctl will not do the right thing if there's a pagefault: copy_to_user returns the number of bytes not copied in this case. Fix up vfio to do if (copy_to_user(...)) return -EFAULT; everywhere. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 9 ++++++--- drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 9 ++++++--- drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 6 ++++-- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c index 2760a7b..27a727a 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c@@ -446,7 +446,8 @@ static long vfio_pci_ioctl(void *device_data, info.num_regions = VFIO_PCI_NUM_REGIONS; info.num_irqs = VFIO_PCI_NUM_IRQS; - return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz); + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz)) + return -EFAULT;Ok, but where do we return 0 on success now?
Ouch. Thanks for pointing this out. Fixed in v2. -- MST