Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request from pty_write [was: Linux 4.4.2]
From: Peter Hurley <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-26 00:38:47
Also in:
lkml
On 02/25/2016 02:33 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/25/2016 01:32 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:quoted
On 02/25/2016, 09:51 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:quoted
Jiri, can you check your try_to_wake_up() disassembly for some indirect "jmp" instructions?Nope, there is none. I will reply to all your questions tomorrow. Just quickly, as I have to go (and don't want you to duplicate efforts) the kernel which was used can be obtained here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/binaries/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:I/kernel-default?repository=standard The issue is very weird, indeed, this is what I noted to our bugzilla: The stack trace ends in call of try_to_wake_up. Then, there it has to be some of the indirect calls: callq *0x40(%rax) p->sched_class->select_task_rq from select_task_rq RAX is 0x00000000bb37e180, barely can be read with offset 0x40 callq *0xd85656(%rip) # ffffffff81e2aba0 <smp_ops+0x20> smp_ops.smp_send_reschedule from ttwu_queue_remote Which hardly can be it, given smp_ops is static. So it has to be some other "call *" from a nested function :(. Interestingly, RBP contains address inside try_to_wake_up -- ffffffff810a535a (dunno why) which is: ffffffff810a5355: e8 66 a0 ff ff callq ffffffff8109f3c0 <ttwu_stat> ffffffff810a535a: e9 9d fe ff ff jmpq ffffffff810a51fc <try_to_wake_up+0x3c>That would imply that RSP was off by +8 when the ttwu_stat() epilog was executed so that RBP <= ret addr and RIP <= some local var in try_to_wake_up() stack frame. Looks like R15 in the crash report could be what RBP should have been. Now to find out why RSP is +8
Which I would investigate if I could download that kernel. Unfortunately, OBS doesn't like me so if you could make that kernel available some other way or send me a mixed listing of kernel/sched/core.c
quoted
ttwu_stat does in the begginning: mov $0x16e80,%r14 which is what we actually still have in r14 when it crashes. The first ttwu_stat's "if" has to go through the true branch (otherwise r14 would be overwritten). Another note: we die when jmp/calling to 0xffff88023fd40000. RSI=RDI=0xffff88023fdd6e80. RSI-RIP is 0x96e80, which is R14 + 0x80000. Coincidence? thanks,