Re: Crashes with 874bbfe600a6 in 3.18.25
From: Daniel Bilik <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-05 08:14:32
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:40:46 +0100 Mike Galbraith [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 17:39 +0100, Daniel Bilik wrote:quoted
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:20:44 +0100 Jan Kara [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Thanks for backport Thomas and to Mike for persistence :). I've asked my friend seeing crashes with 3.18.25 to try whether this patch fixes the issues. It may take some time so stay tuned...Patch tested and it really fixes the crash we were experiencing on 3.18.25 with commit 874bbfe+. But it seem to introduce (rather scary) regression. Tested host shows abnormal cpu usage in both kernel and userland under the same load and traffic pattern. One picture is worth a thousand words, so I've taken snapshots of our graphs, see here: http://neosystem.cz/test/linux-3.18.25/ The host was running 3.18.25 with commit 874bbfe+ (1e7af29+ on 3.18-stable) reverted. With this commit included, it crashed within minutes. Around 13:30 we booted 3.18.25 with commit 874bbfe+ included and with the patch from Thomas. And around 15:40 we've booted the host with previous kernel, just to ensure this abnormal behaviour was really caused by the test kernel. Also interesting, in addition to high cpu usage, there is abnormally high number of zombie processes reported by the system.IMHO you should restore the CC list and re-post. (If I were the maintainer of either the workqueue code or 3.18-stable, I'd be highly interested in this finding).
Sorry, I haven't realized tha patch proposed by Thomas is already on its way to stable. CC restored and re-posting. -- Daniel Bilik neosystem.cz