3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Boqun Feng <redacted>

commit 49e9cf3f0c04bf76ffa59242254110309554861d upstream.

According to memory-barriers.txt:

Any atomic operation that modifies some state in memory and returns
information about the state (old or new) implies an SMP-conditional
general memory barrier (smp_mb()) on each side of the actual
operation ...

Which mean these operations should be fully ordered. However on PPC,
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER is the barrier before the actual operation,
which is currently "lwsync" if SMP=y. The leading "lwsync" can not
guarantee fully ordered atomics, according to Paul Mckenney:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/14/970

To fix this, we define PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER as "sync" to guarantee
the fully-ordered semantics.

This also makes futex atomics fully ordered, which can avoid possible
memory ordering problems if userspace code relies on futex system call
for fully ordered semantics.

Fixes: b97021f85517 ("powerpc: Fix atomic_xxx_return barrier semantics")
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <redacted>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/synch.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/synch.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/synch.h

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static inline void isync(void)
 	MAKE_LWSYNC_SECTION_ENTRY(97, __lwsync_fixup);
 #define PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER	 "\n" stringify_in_c(__PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER)
 #define PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER	 stringify_in_c(LWSYNC) "\n"
-#define PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER "\n" stringify_in_c(LWSYNC) "\n"
+#define PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER "\n" stringify_in_c(sync) "\n"
 #define PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER	 "\n" stringify_in_c(sync) "\n"
 #else
 #define PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER