Thread (116 messages) 116 messages, 6 authors, 2014-08-26

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/104] 3.12.27-stable review

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2014-08-23 18:10:39
Also in: lkml

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 08:14:54 -0700
On 08/21/2014 01:05 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
quoted
The last three are just cosmetical in 3.12. And I do not immediately
see
in the rest, how they could improve the state. So I am going to remove
the add-basic-validations patch from 3.12.
Build and tests now look good.
I am hugely disappointed in this.

This is why I really do all the backports for each -stable release
myself and I therefore really wish there was more thought put into
when these changes are placed into other trees.

Almost all of those sparc64 memory management fixes should not go into
anything before v3.13, because all of these fixes are in the context
of the page tables encoding PMDs using the PTE layout.

If you're just forcing changes you see go into other -stable
submissions into your tree until they compile, and just hoping that a
tester will catch any problems, you are absolutely doing it wrong and
taking a large amount of value out of the -stable releases.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help