3.11.10.15 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "zhangwei(Jovi)" <redacted>

commit f0160a5a2912267c02cfe692eac955c360de5fdf upstream.

The TRACE_ITER_PRINTK check in __trace_puts/__trace_bputs is missing,
so add it, to be consistent with __trace_printk/__trace_bprintk.
Those functions are all called by the same function: trace_printk().

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/51E7A7D6.8090900@huawei.com

Signed-off-by: zhangwei(Jovi) <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <redacted>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index c75803fba4b9..3ef771112cde 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c

@@ -436,6 +436,9 @@ int __trace_puts(unsigned long ip, const char *str, int size)
 	int alloc;
 	int pc;
 
+	if (!(trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_PRINTK))
+		return 0;
+
 	pc = preempt_count();
 
 	if (unlikely(tracing_selftest_running || tracing_disabled))

@@ -483,6 +486,9 @@ int __trace_bputs(unsigned long ip, const char *str)
 	int size = sizeof(struct bputs_entry);
 	int pc;
 
+	if (!(trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_PRINTK))
+		return 0;
+
 	pc = preempt_count();
 
 	if (unlikely(tracing_selftest_running || tracing_disabled))

-- 
1.9.1