Re: [PATCH] xen/pci: Deal with toolstack missing an 'XenbusStateClosing'.
From: konrad wilk <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-11 16:08:37
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml, xen-devel
On 6/11/2013 11:36 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
On 06/10/2013 10:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:quoted
There are two tool-stack that can instruct the Xen PCI frontend and backend to change states: 'xm' (Python code with a daemon), and 'xl' (C library - does not keep state changes). With the 'xm', the path to disconnect a PCI device (xm pci-detach <guest> <BDF>)is: 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)->5(Closing*). The * is for states that the tool-stack sets. For 'xl', it is similar: 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected) Both of them also tear down the XenBus structure, so the backend state ends up going in the 3(Initialised) and calls pcifront_xenbus_remove.So I looked a little bit into this; there are actually two different states that happen as part of this handshake. In order to disonnect a *device*, xl signals using the *bus* state, like this: * Wait for the *bus* to be in state 4(Connected) * Set the *device* state to 5(Closing) * Set the *bus* state to 7(Reconfiguring) * Wait for the *bus* state to return to 4(Connected) So are all of these states you see the *bus* state? And why would you disconnect the whole pci bus if you're only removing one device?
Correct. The stats I enumerated are *bus* states. Not per-device states. I presume (and I hadn't checked xm) that Xend has some logic to only disconnect the bus if all of the PCI devices have been disconnected. In 'xl' it does not do that. The testing I did was just with one PCI device.
-George