3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <redacted>

commit a7227a0faa117d0bc532aea546ae5ac5f89e8ed7 upstream.

dev_pm_qos_add_request() can return 0, 1, or a negative error code,
therefore the correct error test is "if (error < 0)." Checking just for
non-zero return code leads to erroneous setting of the req->dev pointer
to NULL, which then leads to a repeated call to
dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() in st1232_ts_irq_handler(). This in turn
leads to an Oops, when the I2C host adapter is unloaded and reloaded again
because of the inconsistent state of its QoS request list.

Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/base/power/qos.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c

@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ int dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(stru
 	if (ancestor)
 		error = dev_pm_qos_add_request(ancestor, req, value);
 
-	if (error)
+	if (error < 0)
 		req->dev = NULL;
 
 	return error;