Hi Ben,


On 10/27/2012 11:26 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:

On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 17:06 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
[...]

quoted

 #define __NR_available287			287
-__SYSCALL(287, sys_faccessat, 0)
+__SYSCALL(287, sys_ni_syscall, 0)

[...]

Why was this one un-plumbed rather than properly numbered (#define
__NR_faccessat)?

I can only speculate, that this was probably a copy/paste error that has been there for a long time. __NR_faccessat is (and was) defined as number 301. Given that 287 was never defined, it's save to
fix the table entry and set it to sys_ni_syscall.

unistd.h:
[...]
#define __NR_faccessat                          301
__SYSCALL(301, sys_faccessat, 4)
[...]

Thanks,
-Chris