Re: [PATCH] slub: fix a memory leak in get_partial_node()
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2012-05-16 14:50:40
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:56:50PM +0900, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
2012/5/16 Pekka Enberg [off-list ref]:quoted
<On Tue, 15 May 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:quoted
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:quoted
In the case which is below, 1. acquire slab for cpu partial list 2. free object to it by remote cpu 3. page->freelist = t then memory leak is occurred.Hmmm... Ok so we cannot assign page->freelist in get_partial_node() for the cpu partial slabs. It must be done in the cmpxchg transition. Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <redacted>Joonsoo, can you please fix up the stable submission format, add Christoph's ACK and resend? � � � � � � � � � � � �PekkaThanks for comment. I'm a kernel newbie, so could you please tell me how to fix up the stable submission format? I'm eager to fix it up, but I don't know how to. I read stable_kernel_rules.txt, this article tells me I must note upstream commit ID. Above patch is not included in upstream currently, so I can't find upstream commit ID. Is 'Acked-by from MAINTAINER' sufficient for submitting to stable-kernel? Is below format right for stable submission format?
No.
Please read the second item in the list that says: "Procedure for
submitting patches to the -stable tree" in the file,
Documentation/stable_kernel_rulest.txt. It states:
- To have the patch automatically included in the stable tree, add the tag
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
in the sign-off area. Once the patch is merged it will be applied to
the stable tree without anything else needing to be done by the author
or subsystem maintainer.
Does that help?
thanks,
greg k-h