Re: Linux 3.0.24
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2012-03-15 16:37:56
Also in:
lkml
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2012-03-15 16:37:56
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:23:22PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:34:51PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:quoted
I'm announcing the release of the 3.0.24 kernel. All users of the 3.0 kernel series must upgrade.Is the word "must" defined anywhere?
Surely you have a dictionary somewhere?
When I read it, it looks like there are serious patches included in this release, perhaps data integrity or security patches. But "must" has been in an awful lot of these release notes lately, that it makes me wonder if it is boilerplate. Just curious how to interpret this.
Interpret it as written please. thanks, greg k-h