Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 10 authors, 2012-01-11

Re: [PATCH] x86,sched: Fix sched_smt_power_savings totally broken

From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-10 14:41:32
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 06:32 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
a very good default would be to keep all tasks on one package until half
the cores in the package are busy, and then start spreading out. 
Does that still make sense when there's strong NUMA preference? By
forcing stuff on a single package you increase the number of remote
memory fetches (which generally generate more stalls), also the memory
controllers need to stay awake anyway.

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help