Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2021-01-20

Re: [PATCH 1/3] tty: hvcs: Drop unnecessary if block

From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-15 08:20:41
Also in: linuxppc-dev, lkml

On 14. 01. 21, 18:57, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
If hvcs_probe() succeeded dev_set_drvdata() is called with a non-NULL
value, and if hvcs_probe() failed hvcs_remove() isn't called.

So there is no way dev_get_drvdata() can return NULL in hvcs_remove() and
the check can just go away.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
  drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c | 3 ---
  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
index 509d1042825a..3e0461285c34 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
@@ -825,9 +825,6 @@ static int hvcs_remove(struct vio_dev *dev)
  	unsigned long flags;
  	struct tty_struct *tty;
  
-	if (!hvcsd)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
  	/* By this time the vty-server won't be getting any more interrupts */
  
  	spin_lock_irqsave(&hvcsd->lock, flags);

-- 
js
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help