Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] image-artifact-names: Use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH when making reproducible builds
From: Richard Purdie <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-03 13:35:27
On Sat, 2021-10-02 at 23:18 +0100, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
quoted hunk
Using DATETIME means the deploy output is not deterministic. Use SDE when using reproducible builds since it is consistent for given input data. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <redacted> --- meta/classes/image-artifact-names.bbclass | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/meta/classes/image-artifact-names.bbclass b/meta/classes/image-artifact-names.bbclass index 3ac8dd731a6..df9e17c6b0f 100644 --- a/meta/classes/image-artifact-names.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/image-artifact-names.bbclass@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ IMAGE_BASENAME ?= "${PN}" IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX ?= "-${DATETIME}" -IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX[vardepsexclude] += "DATETIME" +IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX[vardepsexclude] += "DATETIME SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH" IMAGE_NAME ?= "${IMAGE_BASENAME}-${MACHINE}${IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX}" IMAGE_LINK_NAME ?= "${IMAGE_BASENAME}-${MACHINE}"@@ -13,3 +13,10 @@ IMAGE_LINK_NAME ?= "${IMAGE_BASENAME}-${MACHINE}" # by default) followed by additional suffices which describe the format (.ext4, # .ext4.xz, etc.). IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX ??= ".rootfs" + +python () { + if bb.data.inherits_class('reproducible_build', d): + import datetime + d.setVar("IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX", "-" + datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(int(d.getVar("SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH")), datetime.timezone.utc).strftime('%Y%m%d%H%M%S')) + d.setVarFlag("IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX", "vardepvalue", "") +}
This patch is incorrect. It breaks images as they have noexec do_unpack tasks. Cheers, Richard