On Wednesday 15 August 2012 12:17:40 Jack Mitchell wrote:

quoted

1) Do we rename "task" to something a little more understandable to the
uninitiated, such as "package group"? The word "task" is already used in a
much more natural sense within bitbake as a unit of work. Historically I
believe we picked up this term from Debian but I'm not aware of
significant use by other mainstream distributions.

Do the 'tasks' do anything other than specify meta-data groups? If they
don't include any glue or additional processes then I strongly agree
that the name should be changed.

They don't, no. Usually they are just lists of packages, although sometimes 
there is some very basic logic to conditionally include/exclude some packages 
based on DISTRO_FEATURES, MACHINE_FEATURES, COMBINED_FEATURES etc. or allow 
substitution of default packages with others using variables.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre