Re: [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix
From: Bruce Ashfield <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-21 12:44:24
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Richard Purdie [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:quoted
This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling lib32-core-image-sato-sdk. Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <redacted> --- meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc index 3b03c05..048608c 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022"PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot" PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils" +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils" PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}"Bruce has just totally rearranged this code. Could you check if the new recipe still suffers from this issue please?Sure, I'm on it.
Yep. We still need this addition to the recipe .. luckily, easy to do :) Cheers, Bruce
Thanks, Bogdanquoted
Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end"